diff --git a/wai/research/2030-transport-landscape.md b/wai/research/2030-transport-landscape.md
index 0f9308d14..47ddd78a9 100644
--- a/wai/research/2030-transport-landscape.md
+++ b/wai/research/2030-transport-landscape.md
@@ -534,7 +534,57 @@ quantum, world or haptic families, whose register entries WAI must author itself
 And the grammar is thin, close to a JSON-Schema subset; the value is the ratified
 precedent and the register discipline, not novel machinery.
 
-### 4.4 What must NOT be bound
+### 4.4 The streaming-format slot, and how CMSF proves it is open
+
+MoQ separates **transport** (`draft-ietf-moq-transport`, rev 18, approaching WG
+Last Call) from **streaming format** (`draft-ietf-moq-msf`). MOQT moves objects;
+MSF says what the objects *mean* — it fragments a bitstream into objects, uses a
+**catalog** to declare what a publisher emits, and sets prioritisation.
+
+The catalog's `packaging` field names the format, and MSF's own text fixes its
+value set: `loc`, `mediatimeline`, `eventtimeline`, `moqlog`, `moqmetrics`,
+`catalog`. There is no central streaming-format registry.
+
+**CMSF shows the set is not closed in practice.** `draft-ietf-moq-cmsf` is a
+sibling Internet-Draft that:
+
+- declares `packaging` value **`cmaf`**, stating in §3.5.1 that it *"extends the
+  allowed packaging values defined in [MSF]"*;
+- inherits MSF wholesale — *"All of the specifications, requirements, and
+  terminology defined in [MSF] apply to implementations of this extension"*;
+- adds two **track-level** catalog fields (`maxGrpSapStartingType`,
+  `maxObjSapStartingType`);
+- and registers nothing: **"This document has no IANA actions."**
+
+A sibling draft, no registry action, no permission sought. That is the cheapest
+standards path anywhere in this survey, and it is already walked — LOCMAF is a
+second instance of the same move.
+
+**What CMSF did not take is the per-object slot.** MSF §12 defines MSF Properties
+at **Track** *and* **Object** scope, with an IANA *MSF Property Type values*
+registry that today holds essentially one entry (`MSF_COMPRESSION`). CMSF adds
+track-level fields only and defines no per-object property.
+
+A per-object property carrying a content commitment and a measured-energy figure
+is the shape `jwp-receipts.md` already has. This is the one place in this survey
+where WAI's existing artifact fits an existing extension point **without
+redesign** — the receipt is already per-object, and the slot is already per-object
+and empty.
+
+Two constraints, both per §4.4. First, what would be bound is the **field
+semantics and the rule over them**, never MOQT's extension-header byte encoding —
+that stays MOQT's. Second, MOQT is pre-Last-Call: a binding written now is
+written against a moving target, so the honest form is a draft that tracks the
+transport rather than a normative extension that pins it.
+
+*Provenance of this subsection:* added after the sweep, from direct reads of
+`draft-ietf-moq-msf` and `draft-ietf-moq-cmsf-00`. The automated survey did not
+surface the streaming-format layer at all — it found MoQ only through the
+confidentiality binding WAI already has — which is itself worth noting about the
+method: a sweep keyed to *what is new* can miss a slot that is old, open, and
+unclaimed.
+
+### 4.5 What must NOT be bound
 
 Stated explicitly so it is not re-argued: ISOBMFF/DASH carriage of green
 metadata; the RTCP feedback messages themselves; the C2PA Decoupled HTTP
@@ -920,6 +970,7 @@ Items 1–2 are internal defects that need no external dependency at all.
 | 11 | **NMOS constraint-set grammar over the capability registry** (§4.3) | a sink-side precondition on §4 dispatch; author register entries for the non-broadcast families | BCP-004-01/-02 v1.0.0 (ratified) | makes §7.1 rendition selection evaluable rather than policy-deferred |
 | 12 | **Register the Part 16 derivation operations with a per-operation determinism tier** (§3.1) | capability strings + tiers; do not adopt compositing | ISO/IEC 23001-16:2021 (published) | prevents restating a 2021 ratification as a WAI invention |
 | 13 | **MPEG-AI Part 6 requirement mapping + SC 29 membership path** (§6.5) | map WAI's measured-energy binding and determinism tiers onto the CfP requirements | CfP responses due **13 January 2027** | the only square in this survey with a deadline |
+| 13b | **MoQ streaming-format binding** — a sibling I-D declaring `packaging: "wai"`, plus a per-object MSF Property carrying the JWP content commitment and measured joules (§4.4) | one draft; inherit MSF; **no IANA action** (CMSF precedent) | `draft-ietf-moq-msf` / `-cmsf`; MOQT pre-Last-Call, so track rather than pin | the per-object property slot is empty, the receipt is already per-object, and the transport is the one Akamai-class delivery is converging on |
 | 14 | **Watch list** | relay geocode (unadopted I-D, data model only); FCM cut-point receipt; the VCM conformance suite when it issues; ISO/IEC 23001-11 4th ed. and 23001-19 catalogue confirmation | — | none is a stable surface yet |
 
 ---