| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
35e4ea0cb7
All checks were successful
energy meters on real hardware / RAPL and NVML on jetson-hub (pull_request) Successful in 33s
jouleclaw public surface must stay documented / Public-surface audit (jouleclaw-rs) (pull_request) Successful in 58s
standards workspaces build + test / arl-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
standards workspaces build + test / eoc-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
standards workspaces build + test / jcp-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-ui-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
standards workspaces build + test / joulehook-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
standards workspaces build + test / jouleclaw-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m52s
standards workspaces build + test / aac-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
standards workspaces build + test / proof-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-code-rs (pull_request) Successful in 50s
standards workspaces build + test / joulecontract-rs (pull_request) Successful in 33s
standards workspaces build + test / map-rs (pull_request) Successful in 32s
standards workspaces build + test / sandbox-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m10s
standards workspaces build + test / mesh-rs (pull_request) Successful in 28s
standards workspaces build + test / sense-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
standards workspaces build + test / openpay (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
standards workspaces build + test / smart-byte-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m37s
standards workspaces build + test / jouledesk-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m55s
standards workspaces build + test / macOS energy backends (pull_request) Successful in 9m18s
Two tests failed on the dev Mac, which is also the macOS CI runner, at
load averages of 101-179. Neither failure was in the meters:
- eoc-meter `the_probe_burns_its_tick_of_thread_cpu_between_samples`.
A tick burned only 9.6 ms of the thread's CPU, under the 12.5 ms
floor, because its 500 ms wall cap cut it short. The test's own
message names that cap as the one thing allowed to shorten a tick,
but the test could not tell it apart: ProbeRun recorded no tick's
wall time. It now records each tick's wall time (`tick_walls`;
recorded, never decided on). A tick that ran its whole wall cap is
accepted as cut short, but only if it still spun, burning at least
1 ms of CPU. Any other tick must burn at least half its 25 ms, as
before.
- jouleclaw-energy `process_cpu`. The `/bin/sh` child, run for a fixed
300 ms, got 0.076 J of CPU against a 0.2 J sanity floor (load average
170). It failed 3 of 3 runs. The child now runs until its own counter
reads 0.2 J (at least 300 ms, at most 5 s), as eoc-meter's equivalent
test already does. The parent's window still spans the child's whole
run.
Both pass at a load average of 333. Both tick mutations are caught: a
tick that sleeps through its wall cap ("ran its whole 504.6ms wall cap
and burned only 87.375µs ... it waited, not spun"), and one that sleeps
25 ms.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
|
||
| .. | ||
| cookbook | ||
| docs | ||
| eoc-bench | ||
| eoc-rs | ||
| os | ||
| spec | ||
| standards | ||
| vocab | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
| THREE_FACES.md | ||
EOC — Energy-Optimized Compute
A free, always-available, energy-honest AI substrate. AI that costs joules, not tokens.
AI is not free yet. The internet is. EOC closes the gap: a substrate that resolves work at the lowest sufficient cost and refuses to spend unbounded energy chasing benchmark deltas. Every query flows through a four-stage pipeline — state-construct → retrieve → refine → check — and a large language model is one of six refine operators, ordered last. The Fourth Truth: refinement before generation. The substrate runs in a browser, runs on commodity CPUs, denominates everything in joules per task against an open evaluation corpus, and cannot be turned off because no one entity runs it.
The substrate is intentionally ownerless: no protocol-level token, permissive licensing, conformance test vectors and open eval corpora so any implementation can verify itself without a trust relationship with the authors. Transaction Science is one steward — it publishes the spec, ships a reference implementation, and operates commercial services around the substrate (managed nodes, certification, registry hosting) — not its proprietor.
Contents
spec/eoc1_spec.docx,spec/eoc1_v0_1_1_patch.docx,spec/eoc1_v0_2.docx,spec/eoc1_v0_2_addendum_A.docx— EOC-1: the substrate architecture (v0.1 tiers → v0.2 four-stage pipeline; Addendum A: non-goals — token economics)spec/eoc2_wire.docx— EOC-2: the wire protocol (capability exchange, gossip, signed envelopes)spec/eoc3.docx— EOC-3: artifact distribution (content-addressed fetch for models, state machines, corpora)spec/eoc4_dcy.docx— EOC-4: DCY (Deterministic Cypher — the query language for the knowledge-graph retrieve operator)spec/eoc5_registry.docx— EOC-5: the Operator Family Registry (stable identifiers + conformance tests)spec/eoc1_eval001*.docx,spec/eval001_worked_instances.docx,spec/eval002.docx— Eval-001 (schema-conformant generation proficiency standard) and Eval-002 (retrieval/provenance)spec/eoc_architecture.docx— the architecture working draftspec/tokens_concealment.docx— Tokens Are the Concealment (the rhetorical companion to Addendum A)os/THEOREM.md,os/Q1_W_DEFINITION.md— the energy-first OS theorem the substrate is designed to run on, and the resolution of its open question on defining "useful work" in joules-per-work
Status
EOC-1 at v0.2; EOC-2..5 and Eval-001/002 at working-draft 0.1; OS theorem at v0.2. The reference implementation referenced across the specs as "v0.3" is to be brought into this repository.
Related
- Smart Byte (
../smart-byte/) — the value substrate; uses EOC's energy attribution. - TX Science AI (
ais.transaction.science) — the AI PaaS; its memoizing cascade is an instance of the EOC four-stage pipeline.