open-standards/joulecontract
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
David Charlot 7eee267a06
All checks were successful
standards workspaces build + test / eoc-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m56s
standards workspaces build + test / jcp-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
standards workspaces build + test / jouleclaw-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m37s
standards workspaces build + test / proof-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
standards workspaces build + test / aac-rs (pull_request) Successful in 52s
standards workspaces build + test / sandbox-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m7s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-code-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m54s
standards workspaces build + test / smart-byte-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m34s
standards workspaces build + test / joulecontract-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m3s
standards workspaces build + test / map-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m24s
standards workspaces build + test / mesh-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m52s
standards workspaces build + test / arl-rs (pull_request) Successful in 18m13s
standards workspaces build + test / openpay (pull_request) Successful in 6m30s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-ui-rs (pull_request) Successful in 24m22s
standards workspaces build + test / jouledesk-rs (pull_request) Successful in 40m4s
standards workspaces build + test / joulehook-rs (pull_request) Successful in 12m31s
standards workspaces build + test / sense-rs (pull_request) Successful in 18m28s
joulecontract: the negative replay could pass with the pack missing
The replay test opened with the same `if !dir.exists() { return; }` the other
two vector-pack tests had — and that early return fires *before* the
`replayed >= 11` guard at the end of the function. So a missing or moved pack
reported green, which is precisely the case that guard was written to catch. I
had described the test as anti-vacuous; with that return in place it was not.

`main` has since replaced the same pattern in `vector_pack_tests` with an
assertion, on the grounds that this crate is not published and so only ever runs
in-repo where the pack is always present. That reasoning applies unchanged here,
so the replay now asserts too, and the three pack tests in this file agree.

Verified in both directions rather than one:
  - pack present: 10 passed
  - pack moved aside: the replay FAILS, naming the path it could not find
Before this change the second case passed. The pack was restored and confirmed
byte-identical with `git status`, not by assumption.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-09-17 21:07:54 -04:00
..
archive joulecontract v0.8: the implementability amendment — round five seals the pack 2026-06-10 16:21:44 -04:00
conformance joulecontract v0.8: the implementability amendment — round five seals the pack 2026-06-10 16:21:44 -04:00
joulecontract-rs joulecontract: the negative replay could pass with the pack missing 2026-09-17 21:07:54 -04:00
provenance docs + no-vanity-metrics: reword two counts, fix scanner false positive 2026-06-13 22:14:13 -04:00
LICENSE Add the JouleContract standard — a carrier for obligation 2026-06-10 03:30:59 -04:00
LICENSE-SPEC Add the JouleContract standard — a carrier for obligation 2026-06-10 03:30:59 -04:00
README.md joulecontract v0.8: the implementability amendment — round five seals the pack 2026-06-10 16:21:44 -04:00
SPEC.md joulecontract v0.8: the implementability amendment — round five seals the pack 2026-06-10 16:21:44 -04:00

JouleContract

A carrier for obligation. Five clauses, one signed receipt, owned by no one.

JouleContract is the contract cargo class of the Transaction Science substrate. Where Smart Byte carries value, EOC carries compute, Joule Code carries coding work, and Map carries place, JouleContract carries the promise itself: a content-addressed statement of what a unit of work must hold (pre, post, inv), what it may touch (frame), and what it may spend (ceiling, a joule EnPI against a signed baseline). It is the operand the rest of the family acts on — Joule Code carries its changes, the proof standard discharges its obligations, JouleClaw budgets dispatch against its ceiling — and its single signed receipt simultaneously evidences functional safety, energy management, and AI governance: three audit programs collapsed into three projections of one receipt log.

The doctrine

Inherit, don't invent — bind, don't name — seal, don't float. Three normative consequences:

  1. The binding rule. Every trust-bearing field — generator, frame, qualification, independence, the joule figure itself — binds to a key, a sealed attestation, or an independent timestamp, or serializes one of twenty-two demoted states. A field that is named but not bound does not exist in a conformant receipt. Metered without a meter attestation is metered_unattested; independence is computed from key disjointness, never copied from a producer's flag.
  2. The sealing rule. Conformance is evaluated once, at discharge, against a content-addressed evidence bundle, and sealed. Re-verification is resolution-free — no DNS, no live registry, no reachable authority — which is also what makes conformant receipts producible air-gapped. Receipts do not rot, and nothing re-grades them later.
  3. Breach is deviation without amendment. Contracts bend instead of break: amendments are metered, independently timestamped transitions that govern the future only. A withheld receipt is visible as withheld; a past out-of-frame effect stays a breach forever; an unamended deviation caps the Governance class until closed.

Rigor, honestly

Conformance is a composed profile — ⟨Rigor JR-1..4 · Energy class · Governance class⟩ — gated by the least-bound axis, with a claim-discipline rule: the bare word "conformant" is itself a non-conformant claim. The limits no document can mechanize are named residuals, not hidden: obligation-set adequacy, common control, issuer-pays gravity, and the demand side — the standard prices honesty; relying parties price assurance.

Provenance

This standard was hardened by adversarial diff, and the diffs are part of it: each version was attacked by independent review lenses, the findings published, and the repairs folded as traced amendments with real digests. SPEC.md §16 carries the full chain; archive/ holds every prior version byte-exact so the chain verifies; provenance/ holds the four diff rounds that produced it — three against the spec text, the fourth against the reference implementation itself.

Contents

  • SPEC.md — normative specification v0.6.0 (RFC 2119), self-hosting amendment log with verified digest chain.
  • archive/ — prior spec versions (v0.1.0–v0.5.0), byte-exact anchors of the amendment chain.
  • provenance/ — the adversarial diff rounds that drove each amendment.
  • joulecontract-rs/ — Rust reference workspace: schema, receipt validation, evidence sealing, amendment/key-log machinery, conformance harness.

Reference implementation and consumers

joulecontract-rs implements the core object, the demoted-state vocabulary, computed independence, the least-bound-axis profile gates, resolution-free sealed verification, and forward-only temporal ordering. The first family consumer is live: joule-code-joulecontract runs a coding operation under a contract — the edit set is the frame, the tier cost is the ceiling, JCR provenance maps downward-only onto the energy classes — and discharges it into a receipt that grades honestly under the two-stage rule. The JouleClaw runtime and the proof standard's cascade are next.

Status

v0.8.0 draft. The amendment chain is real (archive digests verify against §16, mechanically, on every cargo test — seven anchors, v0.1 through v0.7). The reference workspace covers the schema, the receipt-local and composed validators (two-stage evaluation is now normative: local witnesses at most JR-2; JR-3/JR-4 and certified are composed verdicts over the sealed evidence bundle, the office key log, and the transition interval), composition with per-component ceiling accountability (intra-batch netting is structurally dead), the per-EnB ratchet, recourse and sector-equivalence bindings, the mechanical lost/never evidence distinction, cross-digest re-anchoring, evidence sealing with expected-signer verification, the in-toto/DSSE recognized edge, and a regenerable conformance vector pack whose expected verdicts come from the validators themselves. Five adversarial rounds are on the record (provenance/): three against the spec text, the fourth against the implementation (28 findings, four guarantee bypasses, all repaired — folded back as v0.7), and the fifth a clean-room implementability audit of the published artifacts alone, which found the composed validation path unbuildable without reading the reference code — folded back as v0.8, which makes the bundle construction, canonical JSON, quorum scope, obligation matching, and key-log event model normative text, and expands the pack from 13 to 22 vectors with every composed input shipped (member bytes included). Every §15 demoted state is producible by the reference implementation, and a third party can now build the composed validator from the published artifacts alone.

Licence

  • Reference code: Apache-2.0
  • Specification text: CC-BY-4.0