Transaction Science
f4847eafce
standards workspaces build + test / jouleclaw-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
standards workspaces build + test / aac-rs (pull_request) Successful in 34s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-code-rs (pull_request) Successful in 34s
standards workspaces build + test / joulecontract-rs (pull_request) Successful in 36s
standards workspaces build + test / map-rs (pull_request) Successful in 32s
standards workspaces build + test / mesh-rs (pull_request) Successful in 25s
standards workspaces build + test / openpay (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
standards workspaces build + test / eoc-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
standards workspaces build + test / jcp-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
standards workspaces build + test / proof-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
standards workspaces build + test / sandbox-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m6s
standards workspaces build + test / smart-byte-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m32s
standards workspaces build + test / arl-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m52s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-ui-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
standards workspaces build + test / jouledesk-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m12s
standards workspaces build + test / joulehook-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m16s
standards workspaces build + test / sense-rs (pull_request) Successful in 3m17s
standards workspaces build + test / macOS energy backend (jcp-energy) (pull_request) Successful in 2m48s
eoc-meter: the one-thread burn test's floor matches what 200 ms of CPU can cost
...
The process-energy burn test asked for user-interactive QoS so its burn
would run on the fast cores, and it asserted at least 0.2 J. The QoS call
returns 0 but changes nothing: the kernel caps a process with no app role,
such as a test binary, at default QoS. rusage books all of the burn as
default QoS (measured in jcp-energy's matching test, 22e5a6ad ).
The burn already counts 200 ms of the thread's own CPU time, not wall time,
but the energy those 200 ms cost still depends on which core class ran
them, and at what clock. On an M5 Max at default QoS it read 0.18-1.24 J,
so a 0.2 J floor sits at the bottom of the real range.
This drops the ineffective QoS call and its declarations, records why in
the test's doc, and lowers the floor to 0.1 J: half the lowest reading,
and the sleeping test's ceiling. A counter that reads wall time at a fixed
power still cannot pass both tests, and a counter reading 0 still fails.
On this M5 Max, 4/4 pass: the burn read 0.504 J, and 500 ms asleep 21 µJ.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected] >
2026-09-30 22:49:58 -04:00
..
eoc
eoc: the in-process burn test's backend is built only on macOS, where its one test runs
2026-09-30 22:41:13 -04:00
eoc-agent
eoc-agent: every span says whether its joule figure was measured or estimated
2026-09-30 22:38:48 -04:00
eoc-cache
eoc-cascade: a cache hit claims no measurement, and a total is measured only if every microjoule was read
2026-09-30 20:17:08 -04:00
eoc-carbon
eoc-carbon: an account and an SCI score are measured only where every part was, and a run with no correct answer has no score
2026-09-30 21:07:25 -04:00
eoc-cascade
eoc-cascade: a cache hit claims no measurement, and a total is measured only if every microjoule was read
2026-09-30 20:17:08 -04:00
eoc-core
eoc-cascade: a cache hit claims no measurement, and a total is measured only if every microjoule was read
2026-09-30 20:17:08 -04:00
eoc-distributed
ingest wave A4: 3 crates · smart-byte-atproto + op-openbanking + eoc-distributed
2026-05-24 12:22:09 -04:00
eoc-embeddings
Repo-wide toolchain refresh + jouleclaw policy/sandbox updates
2026-06-07 17:04:45 -04:00
eoc-eval
eoc-carbon: an SCI score is only as measured as the joules it was computed from
2026-09-30 20:17:24 -04:00
eoc-graph
Parallel ingest: 9 issues' worth of work across openpay / smart-byte / eoc
2026-05-23 13:24:05 -04:00
eoc-kv
Parallel ingest: 9 issues' worth of work across openpay / smart-byte / eoc
2026-05-23 13:24:05 -04:00
eoc-local
eoc: the CLI's cascade is metered by this process's own counter, because all of its stages run in-process
2026-09-30 22:39:01 -04:00
eoc-memory
ingest wave F: 3 crates · op-crypto-extra + smart-byte-acdc + eoc-memory
2026-05-24 17:28:24 -04:00
eoc-meter
eoc-meter: the one-thread burn test's floor matches what 200 ms of CPU can cost
2026-09-30 22:49:58 -04:00
eoc-multimodal
Repo-wide toolchain refresh + jouleclaw policy/sandbox updates
2026-06-07 17:04:45 -04:00
eoc-neural
Parallel ingest: 9 issues' worth of work across openpay / smart-byte / eoc
2026-05-23 13:24:05 -04:00
eoc-observability
ingest wave C: 3 crates · op-statements + smart-byte-activitypub + eoc-observability
2026-05-24 13:51:09 -04:00
eoc-quantize
ingest wave D: 3 crates · op-fraud-graph + smart-byte-ilp + eoc-quantize
2026-05-24 16:10:10 -04:00
eoc-rag
ingest wave A3: 3 crates · op-ewallets-asia + smart-byte-zk + eoc-rag
2026-05-24 12:08:49 -04:00
eoc-rerank
Repo-wide toolchain refresh + jouleclaw policy/sandbox updates
2026-06-07 17:04:45 -04:00
eoc-route-learned
eoc-route-learned: unbreak the build — rand_distr 0.4 pulled rand 0.8
2026-07-20 12:46:50 -04:00
eoc-safety
ingest wave E: 3 crates · op-bin + smart-byte-tendermint + eoc-safety
2026-05-24 16:52:07 -04:00
eoc-spec-decode
Repo-wide toolchain refresh + jouleclaw policy/sandbox updates
2026-06-07 17:04:45 -04:00
eoc-streaming
eoc-streaming: a stream nothing metered has no energy figure, never 0 µJ
2026-09-30 20:17:36 -04:00
eoc-tools
eoc: pin rand off 0.10.2, which does not compile
2026-08-27 13:32:56 -04:00
eoc-vendor-api
Repo-wide toolchain refresh + jouleclaw policy/sandbox updates
2026-06-07 17:04:45 -04:00
eoc-wasm
Parallel ingest: 9 issues' worth of work across openpay / smart-byte / eoc
2026-05-23 13:24:05 -04:00