| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
9b57b96816
All checks were successful
repository checks / lockfiles, tests in CI, workflow hygiene, spec and section references, public text (pull_request) Successful in 55s
standards workspaces build + test / which workspaces this change touches (pull_request) Successful in 17s
standards workspaces build + test / mesh-rs (mesh/mesh-rs, -p mesh-engine-gguf -p mesh-openai --features mesh-engine-gguf/gguf,mesh-openai/server, mesh-rs, linux-arm64) (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
standards workspaces build + test / jouleclaw-rs (-nodebug, jouleclaw/jouleclaw-rs, -p jouleclaw-energy --features rapl,nvml, jouleclaw-rs, linux-arm64, -C target-feature=+fp16) (pull_request) Successful in 3m18s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-code-rs (joule-code/joule-code-rs, joule-code-rs, linux-arm64, true) (pull_request) Successful in 4m14s
standards workspaces build + test / jcp-rs (jcp-conformance, jcp/jcp-rs, -p jcp-energy --features nvml, jcp-rs, linux) (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
standards workspaces build + test / macOS energy backends (pull_request) Successful in 7m41s
standards workspaces build + test / joulehook-rs (joulehook/joulehook-rs, joulehook-rs, linux) (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
standards workspaces build + test / jouledesk-rs (jouledesk/jouledesk-rs, jouledesk-rs, macos) (pull_request) Successful in 2m50s
standards workspaces build + test / sandbox-rs (sandbox-conformance, sandbox/sandbox-rs, sandbox-rs, linux) (pull_request) Successful in 2m16s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-ui-rs (joule-ui/joule-ui-rs, joule-ui-rs, linux) (pull_request) Successful in 8m12s
`Efficiency::wire()` sealed `energy_uj` and `provenance` and nothing about
coverage. So a GPU-only reading (a hardware counter that reads the
accelerator and not the CPU work that drove it) reached a verifier as the
whole unit's energy. The receipt also sealed a `uj_per_accepted_token` over
that reading, which presented it as what the work cost per token. jcp SPEC
§5.2 already said a `Partial` figure MUST NOT be presented as a task total,
and listed the receipts that carry coverage. efficiency/1 was not among them.
`aggregate()` then summed energy across receipts with no coverage and no
provenance, and its per-unit figure came out as clean as a whole one. §5.3
says aggregation takes the floor of both and is never a step at which a
grade improves.
Now:
- The receipt carries `energy_coverage: "Partial"` when the figure is
partial, and omits it when the figure is whole. A whole receipt, and every
receipt sealed before the field existed, keeps its bytes.
- A partial receipt seals no `uj_per_accepted_token`. A partial figure
divided by tokens is not what the work cost per token, nor a bound on it,
since a partial figure can fall short of the work or exceed it.
- `read_payload`, split out of `verify` so the payload rules can be replayed
without a signature, refuses:
- a partial receipt carrying the headline;
- any `energy_coverage` but "Partial" ("Whole" included; absence is Whole);
- a provenance label that is not one of the three.
- `Totals` carries `provenance_floor` and `coverage`. A total over any partial
receipt is partial, gives no per-unit energy, and reports value per joule
as its worst value (0.0).
SPEC §5.2 now lists efficiency/1 with these rules. A published pack,
`conformance/v1/efficiency.json` (from `gen_efficiency_vectors`), carries the
readings and refusals and the totals sets must sum to. `tests/efficiency_pack.rs`
replays it from disk.
Tests: 3 new unit tests and 4 pack replays. All 9 mutations of the new rules
are killed. The pack alone catches the headline, coverage-floor and
provenance-floor mutations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
|
||
| .. | ||
| conformance/v1 | ||
| crates | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||