open-standards/jouleclaw
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Transaction Science 460b7201ba
All checks were successful
energy meters on real hardware / RAPL and NVML on jetson-hub (pull_request) Successful in 44s
jouleclaw public surface must stay documented / Public-surface audit (jouleclaw-rs) (pull_request) Successful in 58s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / member · DX12 and Vulkan (cbio-windows) (pull_request) Successful in 12m1s
standards workspaces build + test / which workspaces this change touches (pull_request) Successful in 5s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / does this change touch it (pull_request) Successful in 5s
repository checks / lockfiles, tests in CI, workflow hygiene, spec and section references, public text (pull_request) Successful in 44s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / member · integrated GPU, Vulkan (framework-128gb) (pull_request) Successful in 7m35s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / shader checks · browser build · wasip2 inertness · MSRV (pull_request) Successful in 3m44s
standards workspaces build + test / mesh-rs (mesh/mesh-rs, -p mesh-engine-gguf -p mesh-openai --features mesh-engine-gguf/gguf,mesh-openai/server, mesh-rs, linux-arm64) (pull_request) Successful in 59s
standards workspaces build + test / jouleclaw-rs (-nodebug, jouleclaw/jouleclaw-rs, -p jouleclaw-energy --features rapl,nvml, jouleclaw-rs, linux-arm64, -C target-feature=+fp16) (pull_request) Successful in 2m54s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / member · software Vulkan (linux) (pull_request) Successful in 2m32s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / member · discrete GPU, Vulkan (jetson-hub) (pull_request) Successful in 23m24s
standards workspaces build + test / macOS energy backends (pull_request) Successful in 5m10s
standards workspaces build + test / jouledesk-rs (jouledesk/jouledesk-rs, jouledesk-rs, macos) (pull_request) Successful in 52s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / member · Metal (macos) (pull_request) Successful in 2m20s
wai-quantum WebGPU member / member · browser WebGPU (macos) (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
jouleclaw-energy: another process's GPU client going back is not this pid's problem
`a_gpu_span_is_a_sole_users_rail_or_an_exact_zero_or_no_figure` fails
intermittently on the macOS energy job with

  no client's time went back in the oracle's window

`oracle_times` walks every client in the second reading and gives up the whole
result if any one of their counters went back:

    let d = ns.checked_sub(a.clients.get(id).map_or(0, |c| c.1))?;
    all += d;
    if *p == pid { me += d; }

It has to, because its `all` must be exact to compare against a share. But two
of its three callers want only one pid's own time -- both read
`let (child_ns, _, _) = ...` and drop `all` -- so a client of a wholly unrelated
process being destroyed, or its id reused, takes away a figure that never
depended on it. The GPU is shared with whatever else the host runs, which is
precisely when that happens.

`oracle_pid_time` totals the named pid's clients and no others, and those two
callers use it. The strict reader stays where `all` is actually used.

Deterministic test rather than waiting for a host client to vanish: it builds
the two readings, with this pid's client advancing 5 ms while another process's
goes back, and pins that `oracle_times` gives up where `oracle_pid_time` does
not. It also pins the two cases that must NOT become lenient -- this pid's own
client going back is still no figure, and a pid with no clients is an exact zero
rather than unavailable.

Verified on the GPU host, with the feature the file is gated behind:
`--features ioreport` (without it the target is 0 tests and cargo still exits 0).
Baseline passed=1; with `oracle_pid_time` mutated back to totalling every client
the new test fails, so it discriminates rather than decorates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-16 04:58:14 -04:00
..
conformance/v1 jouleclaw SPEC.md: normative §§8-12 for waves 12-21 2026-06-02 10:42:25 -04:00
jouleclaw-rs jouleclaw-energy: another process's GPU client going back is not this pid's problem 2026-10-16 04:58:14 -04:00
scales compliance: publish the EU draft PUE bands as a sourced data pack, not as code 2026-09-06 06:24:25 -04:00
vocab jouleclaw: wave-24 — contract + handoff + mission + value report 2026-06-03 02:35:34 -04:00
LICENSE jouleclaw: standard skeleton + Phase 1 foundation crates 2026-05-26 09:55:11 -04:00
LICENSE-SPEC licences: ship the Apache-2.0 text the code already declares 2026-10-09 17:22:32 -04:00
README.md licences: ship the Apache-2.0 text the code already declares 2026-10-09 17:22:32 -04:00
ROADMAP.md docs: strip vanity metrics from README + ROADMAP 2026-06-02 07:30:50 -04:00
SPEC.md jouleclaw-energy: a process reads itself only once the reading thread has left its core 2026-10-12 20:50:52 -04:00

JouleClaw — Energy-Optimized AI Runtime

The substrate for AI that costs Joules, not tokens.

Capability per Joule, not capability per parameter.

What JouleClaw is

JouleClaw is a pure-Rust, omni-modal AI runtime + harness + agentic layer governed by Transaction Science as an open standard (5th in the open-standards quartet, alongside OpenPay, Smart Byte, EOC, and WAI).

Every operation JouleClaw performs walks an explicit energy-tiered cascade, top to bottom, stopping at the first stage that closes the query:

Tier Name Cost class What runs here
L0 Cache picojoules Content-addressed cache hits
L1 Lawful nanojoules Deterministic, pre-compiled primitive (text/code only)
L2 Embed sub-millijoules Matryoshka embeddings + nearest-neighbor + hybrid search
L3 Model joules Local SSM / ternary / multimodal / diffusion / etc.
L4 Wire tens of joules Remote frontier RPC (escape hatch only)

L1 (Lawful) is only meaningful for text and code modalities. For image, audio, video and 3D generation, the cascade collapses to L0 / L2 / L3 / L4 — the energy savings come from caching plus dispatch to the cheapest model that meets the quality bar.

Why JouleClaw exists

The mainstream "agentic AI" ecosystem treats inference as the entry point. Every state shift, every tool call, every routing decision runs through a 70-billion-parameter stochastic engine, burning kilojoules to do work that deterministic compute or a hot cache could resolve for microjoules.

JouleClaw inverts the default. Inference is the last resort, not the first. Frozen model weights are less trustworthy than current world state; fresh, provenance-stamped retrieval beats synthesis from training cuts. Every operation is metered in microjoules where the hardware permits it, and in millijoules where it doesn't — the spec is honest about the floor on every platform.

The thermodynamic circuit breaker is the safety mechanism. Set an energy budget; when measured consumption exceeds the budget, the breaker trips and the operation halts. Hallucination loops cannot survive an honest joule ledger.

What's here

Path Contents
SPEC.md JouleClaw v1 spec — cascade tiers, energy contract, receipt
CHARTER.md Stewardship pattern (shared across open-standards)
jouleclaw-rs/ Apache-2.0 Rust reference implementation
spec/ Tier specifications, energy provenance, receipt format
conformance/v1/ Signed wire vectors for cross-implementation verification

Reference implementation

jouleclaw-rs/ is the Apache-2.0 reference implementation in Rust. It runs on Apple Silicon (M3/M4/M5 with UMA + Metal 4 Tensor APIs), AMD Strix Halo / Ryzen AI Max, Intel Lunar Lake, NVIDIA Jetson, and discrete NVIDIA / AMD GPUs.

It is omni-modal: text, code, vision, audio, video, image diffusion, 3D Gaussian splatting, and cross-modal fusion all dispatch through the same energy-tiered cascade.

The MCP tool surface is a JCP consumer: jouleclaw-jcp wraps any jouleclaw-mcp metered tool so every dispatch is decided by the JCP runtime against a signed, metered Grant before a byte reaches the tool — the tool's identity is the content-addressed resource, the call's energy estimate is debited from the grant's joule budget, and every decision (allow and deny alike) seals as a JCR-1 receipt. An injected instruction can name an ungranted tool; it cannot make the gate dispatch it.

Status

v0.1.0 reference implementation in active development. The spec is draft status. Cross-implementation conformance vectors will land with v1.0.0.

License