| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
|
All checks were successful
standards workspaces build + test / jouleclaw-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m57s
standards workspaces build + test / aac-rs (pull_request) Successful in 39s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-code-rs (pull_request) Successful in 38s
standards workspaces build + test / joulecontract-rs (pull_request) Successful in 37s
standards workspaces build + test / map-rs (pull_request) Successful in 31s
standards workspaces build + test / mesh-rs (pull_request) Successful in 28s
no-vanity-metrics / Scan committed Markdown for vanity metrics (pull_request) Successful in 3s
standards workspaces build + test / openpay (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
standards workspaces build + test / eoc-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m49s
standards workspaces build + test / jcp-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
standards workspaces build + test / proof-rs (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
standards workspaces build + test / sandbox-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m7s
standards workspaces build + test / smart-byte-rs (pull_request) Successful in 2m33s
standards workspaces build + test / arl-rs (pull_request) Successful in 5m52s
standards workspaces build + test / joule-ui-rs (pull_request) Successful in 5m24s
standards workspaces build + test / jouledesk-rs (pull_request) Successful in 4m25s
standards workspaces build + test / joulehook-rs (pull_request) Successful in 10m23s
standards workspaces build + test / sense-rs (pull_request) Successful in 7m31s
standards workspaces build + test / macOS energy backend (jcp-energy) (pull_request) Successful in 4m38s
The IOReport watch, `CPU_RAILS`, was "any one": Live as soon as ONE CPU rail
met the sustained-advance rule. The power reading sums every CPU rail
(`counts_once`), and on a multi-die part that is two rails, `DIE_0_CPU
Energy` and `DIE_1_CPU Energy` on an M3 Ultra. So one die live beside a
frozen one would have admitted the meter and bracketed one die's energy as
the whole CPU's, as `HwShunt`. RAPL was already held to every package
counter it sums (
|
||
| .. | ||
| conformance/v1 | ||
| proof-rs | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| LICENSE-SPEC | ||
| README.md | ||
| SPEC.md | ||
proof — A Carrier for Verified Work
The verification cargo class of the substrate. A proof obligation is content-addressed; a solver is anything that can attempt one at a declared tier; a discharged obligation seals as a signed JCR-1 receipt that records which tier closed it and the joules it cost. The standard fixes the one axis the theorem-proving field leaves implicit — joules per verified proof — and makes it portable: any prover can emit a Proof receipt, and any auditor can verify it with the same tooling as a Map, Sandbox, or Joule Code receipt.
The cheapest sufficient solver wins. Every obligation goes to the cheapest rung
that can discharge it — deterministic automation (T0), then SMT (T1), then a
small distilled prover (T2), then a frontier model (T3, last resort) — and
escalates only on failure. Correctness is never traded for energy: a solver
returns proved only when a verifier would accept the artifact, so the standard
changes which tier pays for a proof, not whether it is checked. The joules
spent on a cheaper solver that ran and failed first are disclosed as the cost
of escalation, never hidden. Energy carries an honest provenance tag
(HwShunt / ModelBased / Estimator), and a receipt for an Ungrounded
statement says, in the signed artifact, that the statement was never validated
against intent — a proof is not a specification.
- Site: jouleproof.transaction.science (the JouleProof pillar is the steward + services layer over this standard).
- Licence: Apache-2.0 for reference code (see
LICENSE); CC-BY-4.0 for specification text (seeLICENSE-SPEC). - Status: v0.1.0 draft. Specification core published (
SPEC.md); reference workspaceproof-rs/.
What's here
proof/
├── SPEC.md — the normative standard (§1–§9)
├── conformance/v1/ — published vectors (receipt wire + signed core + envelope)
└── proof-rs/ — the Apache-2.0 reference implementation
The reference implementation (proof-rs/)
proof-schema— the content-addressed goal (blake3(statement‖0x00‖context)), the cheapest-first tier ladder, the honest energy model (HwShunt/ModelBased/Estimatorwith the coupling enforced),SpecGrounding, the verdict, and theSolvertrait every backend implements. Canonical det-CBOR content addressing.proof-solvers— two real rungs, their energy modeled from measured wall time (ModelBased, a ~15 W power model — not a hardware reading): a propositional decider (T0) that parses a boolean goal and decides validity by truth-table in process, andz3(T1) — shell or kept resident across goals — that decides an SMT-LIB goal (assert the negation;unsat⇒ valid). Each refuses rather than fakes, so the router escalates. The model rungs (T2/T3) are honest stand-ins behind the same trait.proof-cascade— the escalation router (every joule accounted,wasted_ujdisclosed), the content-addressed proof cache (the energy flywheel, durable as line-delimited JSON), batch energy accounting against a frontier-only baseline with the per-tier Amdahl breakdown, and a real hardware energy meter (meter— theHwShuntbackend): it brackets a real proof, run on every core, against an idle baseline using the platform's energy interface (IOReport's Energy Model, read directly through its C API on Apple Silicon and used only while every CPU energy rail is live, one per die on a multi-die part; RAPL's package counters on Linux, used only while every one is live) and returns measured microjoules, so the headlinejoules per verified proofcan be a real reading, not only a model. A vendor counter's reading is gradedHwShuntonly while the counter is live for the domain it claims (SPEC.md§5), and the meter checks that before it brackets anything, by one rule on both platforms (the counter keeps advancing in at least 5 sample intervals, at least 4 of every 5, over at least 300 ms while the probe burns CPU): on Apple Silicon for every IOReport CPU energy rail the figure sums (CPU Energy, or each die'sDIE_<n>_CPU Energy), on Linux for every RAPL package counter the figure sums (psysis neither summed nor probed). Returns nothing where no interface is reachable or its counter is not live — the caller keeps the honestly-taggedModelBasedfigure rather than inventing one.proof-receipt— theproof/1JCR-1 receipt: canonical det-CBOR + COSE_Sign1/EdDSA, vendored byte-compatible with the family's cross-language verifiers; refuses to seal an unproved goal.proof-conformance— C1–C5 + a negative pack, all checks real, published vectors inconformance/v1/.proof-cli— theproofreference demo: a proof workload reporting joules-per-proof against a frontier-only baseline — like for like, charged only for the goals the cascade proved, with the all-goals figure and its goal count beside it — the Amdahl breakdown, the cache flywheel, and a sealed + verified receipt.proof --measureadds a real hardware reading of a non-trivial T0 proof (HwShunt) where the meter produces one; that needs a counter the meter has seen to be live (on Apple Silicon every IOReport CPU energy rail, on Linux every RAPL package counter). On the Macs measured so far (macOS 27.0.1, an M5 Max and an M3 Ultra) IOReport's CPU energy rail is frozen for an unprivileged reader, so--measuredeclines there, says why, and leaves every figureModelBased; on Linux, RAPL'senergy_ujis root-only on current kernels.
cargo test --workspace green; cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets is
warning-free for Linux, and on macOS reports two lints in proof-cascade's
IOReport FFI. The two bottom rungs decide for real, with energy modeled from
wall time; the model rungs are honestly marked as stand-ins until inference
backends are wired.
Honesty the standard records
- A proof is not a specification.
spec_groundingrides in the signed receipt;Ungroundedis the default and a prover may never self-certify it. - The multiple shrinks with difficulty. The accounting reports energy per closing tier, so the few hardest goals dominating the joules (Amdahl) is visible, not averaged away.
- Energy is reported at all — per proof, with an honest provenance tag — which the field otherwise leaves to be inferred from device-days.