open-standards/jouleclaw
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Transaction Science 208ffd374f
Some checks failed
energy meters on real hardware / sink decode table · per-task energy and the GPU rail on macOS (push) Successful in 5m13s
repository checks / lockfiles, advisories, tests in CI, workflow hygiene, spec and section references, public text (push) Has been cancelled
energy meters on real hardware / RAPL and NVML on jetson-hub (push) Failing after 2m37s
jouleclaw public surface must stay documented / Public-surface audit (jouleclaw-rs) (push) Failing after 15m17s
energy meters on real hardware / sink decode table · RAPL on jetson-hub (NVML surveyed) (push) Failing after 20s
The public IOReport status variants say what they mean under the 3-tick cap
The docs of each crate's IoReportStatus still stated the liveness rule as it stood
before the cap: five advances, four in five of the intervals observed, 300 ms of
wall time. Live, and Frozen where it states the rule, now say it as the spec texts
do: what an interval is, that only one no longer than three of the probe's ticks
(75 ms at its 25 ms tick) counts, that a longer one counts as nothing, and that the
300 ms is the summed length of the intervals that count. Frozen also says that a
probe the host held, so that too few of its intervals counted, reads Frozen. In
eoc-meter, jcp-energy, jouleclaw-energy, proof-cascade and sandbox-meter. Doc
comments only.

Changelog: none
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-11-07 08:30:52 -05:00
..
conformance/v1 jouleclaw SPEC.md: normative §§8-12 for waves 12-21 2026-06-02 10:42:25 -04:00
jouleclaw-rs The public IOReport status variants say what they mean under the 3-tick cap 2026-11-07 08:30:52 -05:00
scales compliance: publish the EU draft PUE bands as a sourced data pack, not as code 2026-09-06 06:24:25 -04:00
vocab jouleclaw: wave-24 — contract + handoff + mission + value report 2026-06-03 02:35:34 -04:00
LICENSE jouleclaw: standard skeleton + Phase 1 foundation crates 2026-05-26 09:55:11 -04:00
LICENSE-SPEC licences: ship the Apache-2.0 text the code already declares 2026-10-09 17:22:32 -04:00
README.md licences: ship the Apache-2.0 text the code already declares 2026-10-09 17:22:32 -04:00
ROADMAP.md docs: strip vanity metrics from README + ROADMAP 2026-06-02 07:30:50 -04:00
SPEC.md Every text that states the IOReport liveness rule states it as the meters apply it 2026-11-07 08:20:02 -05:00

JouleClaw — Energy-Optimized AI Runtime

The substrate for AI that costs Joules, not tokens.

Capability per Joule, not capability per parameter.

What JouleClaw is

JouleClaw is a pure-Rust, omni-modal AI runtime + harness + agentic layer governed by Transaction Science as an open standard (5th in the open-standards quartet, alongside OpenPay, Smart Byte, EOC, and WAI).

Every operation JouleClaw performs walks an explicit energy-tiered cascade, top to bottom, stopping at the first stage that closes the query:

Tier Name Cost class What runs here
L0 Cache picojoules Content-addressed cache hits
L1 Lawful nanojoules Deterministic, pre-compiled primitive (text/code only)
L2 Embed sub-millijoules Matryoshka embeddings + nearest-neighbor + hybrid search
L3 Model joules Local SSM / ternary / multimodal / diffusion / etc.
L4 Wire tens of joules Remote frontier RPC (escape hatch only)

L1 (Lawful) is only meaningful for text and code modalities. For image, audio, video and 3D generation, the cascade collapses to L0 / L2 / L3 / L4 — the energy savings come from caching plus dispatch to the cheapest model that meets the quality bar.

Why JouleClaw exists

The mainstream "agentic AI" ecosystem treats inference as the entry point. Every state shift, every tool call, every routing decision runs through a 70-billion-parameter stochastic engine, burning kilojoules to do work that deterministic compute or a hot cache could resolve for microjoules.

JouleClaw inverts the default. Inference is the last resort, not the first. Frozen model weights are less trustworthy than current world state; fresh, provenance-stamped retrieval beats synthesis from training cuts. Every operation is metered in microjoules where the hardware permits it, and in millijoules where it doesn't — the spec is honest about the floor on every platform.

The thermodynamic circuit breaker is the safety mechanism. Set an energy budget; when measured consumption exceeds the budget, the breaker trips and the operation halts. Hallucination loops cannot survive an honest joule ledger.

What's here

Path Contents
SPEC.md JouleClaw v1 spec — cascade tiers, energy contract, receipt
CHARTER.md Stewardship pattern (shared across open-standards)
jouleclaw-rs/ Apache-2.0 Rust reference implementation
spec/ Tier specifications, energy provenance, receipt format
conformance/v1/ Signed wire vectors for cross-implementation verification

Reference implementation

jouleclaw-rs/ is the Apache-2.0 reference implementation in Rust. It runs on Apple Silicon (M3/M4/M5 with UMA + Metal 4 Tensor APIs), AMD Strix Halo / Ryzen AI Max, Intel Lunar Lake, NVIDIA Jetson, and discrete NVIDIA / AMD GPUs.

It is omni-modal: text, code, vision, audio, video, image diffusion, 3D Gaussian splatting, and cross-modal fusion all dispatch through the same energy-tiered cascade.

The MCP tool surface is a JCP consumer: jouleclaw-jcp wraps any jouleclaw-mcp metered tool so every dispatch is decided by the JCP runtime against a signed, metered Grant before a byte reaches the tool — the tool's identity is the content-addressed resource, the call's energy estimate is debited from the grant's joule budget, and every decision (allow and deny alike) seals as a JCR-1 receipt. An injected instruction can name an ungranted tool; it cannot make the gate dispatch it.

Status

v0.1.0 reference implementation in active development. The spec is draft status. Cross-implementation conformance vectors will land with v1.0.0.

License