open-standards/wai/extensions/quantum-ops.md
Transaction Science fb103ac5ae wai: one registry table, candidate capabilities, public-text checks
Every registered string now lives in one table (codecs/registry.rs) with
its kind, status, media class, registering SPEC section, edition and
registration date. `wai registry export` writes registry/capabilities.json,
its JSON Schema, the generated table in REGISTRY.md and vocab v2; --check
fails on drift. vocab v1 stays stable.

A candidate capability (a registered string whose payload format no
revision has pinned) must not be emitted. The C packers, the browser
writers and `wai wrap` refuse one, and `codecs::is_dispatchable` is the
single dispatch and selection predicate (SPEC §4): candidates,
companion-only capabilities, records and derivations are not
dispatchable, and an unregistered string is decoded only where the sink
advertises it.

The codec glossary is linked to the registry through a reviewed table and
held to its schema by a library test; `org` becomes `body`, from a closed
allowlist. The SPEC gains §5 sections on kinds and candidates, a §8
edition rule, corrected citations and rewritten appendices. The
quantum-ops vectors are regenerated with neutral device ids.

CI declares the feature-gated test targets with required-features, checks
the registry export, builds wai-web for wasm32, and runs two public-text
checks (comparative prose, and private name patterns) with a self-test.
The specification, extensions, research notes, READMEs, glossary and
source comments are rewritten to name no company or product and to make
no comparisons.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 22:38:09 -04:00

115 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown

# WAI Extension: Quantum-Operations Attestation (`wai.quantum.calibration` · `wai.quantum.job`)
Status: **Draft.** Engine: `wai-rs/src/quantum_ops.rs` (feature `quantum_ops`).
The **verify-half** of WAI (`wai.asset.provenance`'s lineage, specialized) applied
to the quantum processing industry.
## 0. What this extension adds
A calibration run or a QPU job leaves a dataset (commonly HDF5), a state snapshot
and a log. This extension adds a receipt over each operation with two properties:
1. **cryptographic signature + portability** — a record a *third party* verifies
from the bytes alone;
2. **measured joules** — the energy of the operation, carried with its
acquisition class, on hardware whose dilution refrigerator and control racks
draw kilowatts.
Related reproducibility work exists (version capture of the software that ran, QBOM
bills of materials, hash-chained audit traces such as QCIVET's); the receipt here
is signed, content-addressed and joule-metered. It is not a control system and **runs no
hardware**: the calibration/job is performed by the sink's control stack, exactly
as WAI dispatches a decode to a sink's codec. WAI owns the **receipt**.
## 1. Two receipts, cross-linked
### `wai.quantum.calibration` — `CalibrationReceipt`
A signed record of one bring-up / tune-up run:
- `device_id`, `target` (`"q3"`, `"cz(q3,q4)"`, `"readout:q3"`)
- `config_hash` — content hash of the applied pulse/gate config
- `evidence[]` — each an `{kind, blob_hash, summary}`: a benchmark outcome
(RB / T1·T2 / Rabi / readout-GMM) **content-addressed to its raw dataset bytes**,
so a fidelity *claim* binds to the exact bytes that produced it
(`evidence_matches()`) — checkable, not asserted
- `joules_micro` — measured energy of the run (attested), with its acquisition
class as an optional signed label: `quantum_energy::Labelled` wraps any
receipt here and re-signs it with the class inside the signature, and
`LabelledQbom` labels a bill of materials per entry
([energy-measurement](energy-measurement.md) §2.8). An unlabelled receipt
keeps its legacy bytes.
- `grant` — the authorization (below)
- `parent_receipt_hash` — the prior device state this supersedes: a signed
lineage of device states
`merkle_root` covers `[config_hash] ++ evidence leaves`; one Ed25519 signature
covers the whole payload.
### `wai.quantum.job` — `JobReceipt`
A signed record of one dispatched circuit:
- `backend_id` — which QPU/sim actually ran it (`"example:qpu-a"`, `"wai.quantum.circuit"`)
- `circuit_hash`, `result_hash` (counts histogram / statevector), `shots`
- **`calibration_ref`** — the `CalibrationReceipt::receipt_hash` of the device
state the job ran under. `verify_against_calibration(cal)` confirms the job
names *that* calibration and both verify — the QCIVET **"the claimed calibration
was actually in effect"** property, signed. `None` for a simulator.
- `joules_micro`, `grant`, `parent_receipt_hash`
## 2. The grant — gate ⊗ meter ⊗ receipt in one object
`GrantRef` = **capability ⊗ joule-ceiling** (⊗ optional funds-ceiling, JCP §4.8
dual ceiling). The full grant lives in the JCP layer; the receipt binds its content
hash plus the ceilings it enforces.
The enforcement is the sharp part: **the joule ceiling is checked inside
`verify()`.** A receipt whose measured `joules_micro` exceeds its grant ceiling is
**not valid** — an operation that blew its energy grant *cannot produce a passing
receipt*. This is the whole portfolio thesis (gate, meter, receipt) collapsed into
a single verifiable object. `honors_budget()` exposes the check on its own; a
grant with `joule_ceiling_micro = u64::MAX` opts out (still signs everything else).
## 3. Conformance
- A **conforming producer** (a control stack, or an adapter over one — see §5)
MUST seal a `CalibrationReceipt` per calibration run and a `JobReceipt` per
dispatched job, with `joules_micro` a **measured** figure (never fabricated;
`0`/unbounded if genuinely unmetered) and every hash the real content hash.
- A **conforming verifier** MUST accept a receipt iff `verify()` passes — Merkle
root recomputes, joules within the grant ceiling, signature valid — and, for a
job that claims a calibration state, `verify_against_calibration()` passes.
- Receipts are **portable**: JSON with hex hashes (`to_json`/`from_json`),
verifiable with only the public key. No vendor cloud required.
## 4. What this is NOT
- **Not a control system, not a simulator, not a calibration ML.** It attests
operations others perform. The physical control electronics and the ML tuning
models are the dispatched **backend** — WAI's founding "don't reinvent, dispatch"
philosophy (SPEC Appendix B), applied to quantum control.
- **Not a reconstruction.** `joules_micro` and the result are *attested* (only the
signer can vouch for their own silicon's energy draw); the hashes, Merkle root,
grant ceiling, and cross-link are *verifiable* by anyone. The receipt states
plainly which half is which.
## 5. Integration (where it attaches)
The natural attach point is the **control-system → cloud boundary**: the moment a
calibration node or a job completes, the control system already holds everything a
receipt needs (config, evidence datasets, result, timing, backend identity), and
the power rails are already instrumented — so adding a signature + a joule figure
is *incremental*. Open-source insertion points:
1. **Quantify** (`quantify-core`) — one HDF5-write point covers every node.
2. A lab-OS task-management and database layer, as a control plane; in
production chip testing a signed pass/fail is the record a test produces.
3. **QUAlibrate/QUAM** — the per-node boundary, and its existing record of
package versions, map onto a signed, metered receipt.
4. **Qubex/qube-calib** — a `CalibrationNote` artifact per node.
## 6. The metric
This extension carries joules per verified calibration and joules per QPU job as
signed, portable, content-addressed, grant-bounded records.