open-standards/wai/extensions/oer-receipts.md

WAI Extension: OER Receipts (outcome and energy)

Status: Draft. Ingests OER/2 draft 0.1, with the departures in §9 and the members minor version 1 adds (§3.1): the unmetered marker and the acquisition class of a receipt's figure. An OER receipt records what one unit of work was, what it cost, how that cost is graded, and what it rests on — canonicalised, content-addressed, hash-chained and Ed25519-signed, so a third party can check every figure without trusting the producer. Conformance is reason-set-equivalence: for every published vector, a verifier reports exactly the reasons the vector declares. Verifiers: the reference, oer-conformance/oer2_verify.py, and wai-rs (crate::oer, the oer feature); corpus: oer-conformance/. Keywords MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, MAY are RFC 2119/8174.

1. Scope and model

energy-measurement.md fixes how a joule figure is acquired — the acquisition class. It does not say how much weight the figure can bear. An OER receipt adds that: every figure carries an evidential grade, and the receipt as a whole is canonical, content-addressed and chained, so the grade cannot be quietly upgraded after the fact. A receipt of minor version 0 carries the grade and no acquisition class; one of minor version 1 may carry both (§3.1). The two are different axes (§2).

A receipt describes one unit of work of a declared kind, one of the strings decision, task, reconstruction, calibration, job, compile, decode, mitigate, rearrange, anchor, or bundle (of other receipts). Receipts form a chain; the chain, the records its decisions relied on, and a ledger identity that ties the chain to a meter are verified together.

Three independent implementations check the same corpus: the reference verifier (oer-conformance/oer2_verify.py), the portable C kernel that produces receipts (oer-conformance/settle/), and wai-rs. They share no canonicalisation code.

2. The evidential grade (REQUIRED)

provenance.how MUST be one of four grades, weakest first:

grade	meaning
projected	an estimate awaiting a measurement
simulated	produced by emulation or a model run, not by the system itself
derived	follows from measured or published figures by stated arithmetic
measured	read from an instrument, a datasheet, or a published measurement

A figure's grade is its evidential standing; its acquisition class (energy-measurement.md §2: CalibratedInstrument, OnChipCounter, ModelBased, Estimator, and the legacy HwShunt) is how it was obtained. They are different axes and a receipt SHOULD carry both where it carries an acquisition class at all. A receipt of minor version 0 has no member for the class, and cannot gain one without becoming non-canonical (§3); one of minor version 1 may state it as energy.class (§3.1). Their descriptive members name none. provenance.device is text; the corpus writes hardware, emulation and simulation. energy.method is text too; the corpus writes hardware_meter and model_estimated. In particular, neither hardware nor hardware_meter is HwShunt or either refined hardware class.

energy-measurement.md governs the receipt profiles WAI defines (§1 there), not an OER/2 receipt. No rule of that extension binds an OER receipt or its producers and verifiers: an OER receipt that carries a non-zero energy.joules_total and no class breaks none of them, and that extension's publication gate (§4 there) and reporting contract (§6 there) do not apply to it either. Its evidential axis is the grade, under this document's rules.

The two axes correspond in one direction:

acquisition class	supports the grade
CalibratedInstrument	measured
OnChipCounter	measured
HwShunt (legacy)	measured: a figure sealed before the hardware class was refined, or a refined hardware figure mapped into the three-name vocabulary (below)
ModelBased	derived, by energy-measurement.md's own definition
Estimator	projected

• Both refined hardware classes are readings of an instrument, so both support measured. The grade does not carry what separates them: whether the figure's uncertainty is traceable to a calibration (energy-measurement.md §2.2). The class and its declared uncertainty (§2.3 there) say that; measured does not.
• Legacy HwShunt is what WAI receipts sealed before the refinement say. It ranks below both refined classes, and energy-measurement.md §2.6 forbids it in a new WAI receipt, so a hardware figure a conforming WAI receipt seals today names OnChipCounter or CalibratedInstrument. Mapped into a vocabulary that has only HwShunt / ModelBased / Estimator, both refined classes become HwShunt (§2 there); the grade does not change, so a HwShunt figure produced that way supports measured too. A receipt that records no class says, by a figure graded measured, nothing of which hardware class, if any, is behind it.
• The correspondence does not run the other way: measured also covers a datasheet or a published figure, which no acquisition class names, and simulated has no acquisition-class counterpart at all.

A producer MUST NOT grade measured a figure whose acquisition class is Estimator. A receipt of minor version 0 carries no acquisition-class member (§3), so no reason in §7 checks this there, and it binds the producer; in a receipt of minor version 1 that states its class, class_grade_mismatch checks it (§3.1).

provenance.weakest_input names the lowest-graded input the figure rests on, so a measured total built on a projected constant is visible as such.

The energy claim class of jwp-receipts.md §2.4.5 carries both axes for a delivery receipt's figure: the acquisition class with its evidence, and a grade, which it rejects when it ranks above what the class supports under the correspondence above. It may name the OER receipt that records the figure. A verifier holding that receipt then checks that it verifies under this document, is about the same object (its subject.output is the object's jwp-receipts §2.1 content hash, as the claim writes it), and states the same grade and, to the microjoule, the same figure, read as §4 reads a quantity. That is where the producer rule above becomes checkable for a receipt that states no class, against the class the claim's signer states: a verifier that checks an accepted energy claim against the OER receipt it names holds a receipt graded no higher than that class supports. It changes nothing about the OER receipt itself. A receipt that states the unmetered marker (§3.1) states no figure, so no claim's figure is that receipt's.

3. Receipt members

Members are fixed per path, and only these members may appear:

path	members, in canonical order
(root)	oer, receipt_id, kind, capability, intent, subject, work, energy, provenance, settlement, floor, efficiency, bundle, chain, hash_alg, sig_alg
subject	inputs, output
work	status, outcome, latency_s, proficiency
energy	joules_total, boundary, breakdown, method, temperature_k
energy.breakdown	compute_j, movement_j, idle_alloc_j, shared_alloc_j, upstream_j
provenance	how, device, weakest_input, hardware_profile, corpus
provenance.weakest_input	how, input
settlement	question_key, served_from_record, record_id, record_hash, reuse_count, derivation_j, valid_until
floor	bits_committed, bits_delivered, floor_j, decades_above_floor
efficiency	completed_units, wasted_units, joules_per_completed, waste_fraction, value_per_joule
bundle	stages, provenance_root
bundle.stages[]	kind, receipt_hash, joules
chain	prev_hash, receipt_hash, signer, signature, anchor
chain.anchor	path, delivered_at, root

An object at any other path orders its members by key. A member not listed for its path makes the receipt non-canonical.

oer is the profile version, a string ("2.0"); its major version is the part before the first .. A verifier MUST reject a major version other than 2, and an oer that is not a string, before any check but whether the receipt is an object (§7) — a version written as a JSON number would have a major that depends on how each parser rounds it. energy.boundary MUST be stated: a joule figure without its measurement boundary cannot be compared with any other.

Capability. capability names what the receipt is about, in the receipt's own namespace: a decision receipt names its decision class under oer.decision.* (oer.decision.ev_charging_authorization), and bundles and anchors use oer.bundle.* and oer.anchor.*. A job receipt names the operation its unit of work ran under oer.job.*: oer.job.<operation>, where <operation> is the id of an operation of WAI's operation catalogue (wai/catalogue/ops.json, noun.verb), so a hop that encoded names oer.job.media.encode and one that packaged oer.job.package.build. A record that names a job's operation, such as a route record (route-record §6), holds each hop's receipt to that name. These are not WAI payload capabilities, which name formats a sink reconstructs (SPEC.md §5), and a receipt MUST NOT name them in the wai. namespace.

Output. A job receipt names the objects its unit of work delivered in subject.output, by their commitment, written as 64 lowercase hexadecimal digits:

• one object, by its content hash (jwp-receipts §2.1), the form an energy claim holds an OER receipt to (§2, jwp-receipts §2.4.5);
• several, delivered in an order, by the Merkle root jwp-receipts §2.2 builds over their content hashes in that order, every leaf of the first, unlabelled form: the root a group of exactly those objects is signed over when none carries a class label. The objects are distinct: the tree pads an odd level with a copy of its last node, so a list that repeats an object could share a root with a shorter one, and distinct objects give each list its own root.

The root of one object is not its content hash, and a commitment of several never names one of them alone: one value names one list. No reason of §7 checks the commitment, since a receipt on its own does not show what it delivered; a record that states what a job delivered holds its hop's receipt to it, as a route record of version 2 does (route-record §6).

Status, escalation and abstention. work.status is 1 for a unit of work that completed and -1 for one that was wasted; a bundle's efficiency counts them as completed_units and wasted_units. Two outcomes are easy to confuse:

• escalate — the question was routed to a higher authority and answered there. It is a verdict: subject.output carries the answer and the receipt may store a record that later receipts are served from. This unit did not derive the answer, and says so.
• abstain — no answer. The receipt makes no verdict claim: subject.output is empty, and it stores no record (settlement.served_from_record false, record_id and record_hash empty), so nothing can ever be served from it as settled. A verifier reports abstention_settled for an abstention that carries any of them. Empty and false here mean absent, null, false, 0, "", [] or {}; any other value is a claim.

A producer MUST receipt a decision it did not earn — one closed by a stand-in, a default or a guess — as an abstention, never as a verdict. An unsettled answer is a first-class result. An abstention is completed work (status 1), so efficiency.joules_per_completed counts it; a figure per settled decision MUST NOT.

3.1 Minor version 1: the unmetered marker and the acquisition class

A receipt whose oer is exactly "2.1" is of minor version 1; any other "2.x" is read as minor version 0, under §3's members alone. A receipt of minor version 1 may carry two things a receipt of minor version 0 cannot, and nothing else:

path	members, in canonical order
energy	joules_total, boundary, breakdown, method, temperature_k, class
energy.class	label, relative_ppm, window_us, filtering, calibration_ref

The other paths keep §3's members. Under minor version 0 an energy.class is a member not listed for its path (canonical_failure) and a null joules_total is not a quantity (malformed), as before this revision, so no receipt of minor version 0 reads differently. A verifier that knows only minor version 0 refuses a receipt that uses either, rather than misreading it.

The unmetered marker. An energy.joules_total of null states that nobody measured the unit of work's energy. It is not a figure of zero joules, and a verifier MUST report the receipt as unmetered, never as a figure (energy-measurement §2). A receipt that states it MUST write every energy.breakdown term as null, MUST be graded projected (no figure stands behind it to be measured or derived), MUST NOT carry energy.class, and MUST NOT be a bundle, whose figure is its stages' sum (§6); a receipt that breaks any of these is unmetered_invalid. Its energy.boundary is still stated: it names what would have been measured. Nothing sums to the marker, so the sum check (§6) does not run for it, and a ledger identity over a chain that holds one does not hold (§6, ledger_mismatch).

The acquisition class. energy.class states how joules_total was acquired, as energy-measurement §2 names the classes. label is one of CalibratedInstrument, OnChipCounter, ModelBased and Estimator; the legacy HwShunt is not admitted (energy-measurement §2.6, New profiles). Each label carries exactly its evidence and no other member:

label	members
OnChipCounter	label, relative_ppm (an integer 1 to 2³² − 1: the declared standard relative uncertainty in parts per million, energy-measurement §2.3), window_us (an integer 1 to 2⁵³ − 1: the integration window in microseconds), filtering ("Unknown", "Off" or "On": whether the counter filtered its output, energy-measurement §2.4)
CalibratedInstrument	label, relative_ppm, window_us, calibration_ref (a non-empty string: the calibration certificate's identifier)
ModelBased, Estimator	label

A class that is not an object of these members, each of its form, is class_invalid. A valid class MUST support exactly the receipt's grade, under §2's correspondence (CalibratedInstrument and OnChipCounter measured, ModelBased derived, Estimator projected); a receipt graded otherwise is class_grade_mismatch, checked when the grade is one of §2's (an unknown grade is grade_unknown alone). So the producer rule of §2 is a reason here: a counter reading graded derived, an estimate graded measured and a simulated figure with any class are each refused. A receipt of minor version 1 may omit the class, and then reads as one of minor version 0 does.

4. Canonical form

The canonical body is the receipt without chain and receipt_id, with every object's members in the order of §3, serialised as JSON with , and : as separators and no other whitespace, and with non-ASCII characters written unescaped (UTF-8). Within strings, " \ and the controls \b \f \n \r \t take their short escapes and every other character below U+0020 is written \u00XX in lower-case hex.

Numbers. A receipt body carries two kinds of number and no others. Integers are written in plain decimal, with no fraction or exponent, and lie within ±(2⁵³ − 1): the I-JSON range (RFC 7493 §2.2), which any reader of IEEE 754 binary64 or wider reads exactly. Every non-integer quantity — every joule figure, temperature and ratio — is a decimal string ("14.960786694120"). A number with a fraction or an exponent (1.0, 1e2), negative zero (-0), and an integer outside that range MUST NOT appear in a body, and a verifier MUST report malformed for one. The canonical form therefore never prints a float. That matters because parsers disagree on exactly these shapes — one reads -0 and 2⁶⁴ as exact integers, another as floats — and two verifiers that hashed them would compute two receipt ids for one receipt. The rule is about how a number is written: a verifier whose parser reads 1.0 and 1 as the same value needs a reader that sees the text. Records (§6) are not receipt bodies and are unaffected.

The document. A vector document is read before any receipt in it is verified, and one that cannot be read under this profile is refused whole:

• a number whose nearest binary64, rounding half to even, is infinite — magnitude 2¹⁰²⁴ − 2⁹⁷⁰ or more, in any spelling. A reader MUST round correctly: one that does not refuses finite numbers just below the midpoint, or reads ones past it;
• NaN, Infinity or -Infinity, which are not JSON;
• a string holding an unpaired surrogate, which is not Unicode (RFC 7493 §2.1);
• a member name repeated within one object (RFC 7493 §2.3) — readers disagree on which value wins, so a signed receipt could carry a second, hidden figure;
• nesting deeper than 64 arrays and objects, the document itself counting as one.

The corpus holds one document for each in oer-conformance/unreadable/, among them a repeated figure inside a receipt and nesting far past any parser's limit. A vector in edge_vectors.json holds the extremes a document may carry — the largest binary64 as a float and as an integer, a float just below the midpoint, a surrogate pair, nesting exactly 64 deep — so a verifier that refuses too much fails too.

Decimal strings. A decimal string is JSON's own number grammar (RFC 8259 §6) carried as a string, in ASCII: an optional - and no other sign, no whitespace, no leading zero, digits on both sides of any ., and an exponent of one to three digits. The significand — every digit before the exponent, leading zeros included — has at most 34 digits, so every decimal string is exact in IEEE 754 decimal128. Where a check reads a quantity it accepts a decimal string or an integer in the range above, and nothing else. A receipt member that fails is malformed; a ledger figure that fails makes the identity fail.

The canonical form is pinned independently of the vectors. The reference generator uses the reference verifier's canonicaliser, so a defect in the field order would be baked into every receipt id and then confirmed by the same code — reversing the declared order and regenerating still yields a passing corpus. Every verifier therefore also checks a canonical fixture: an input whose members are given in the wrong order at two levels, against literal expected bytes and their sha-256 id (sha256:364718c7…84ed30). The cross-check against the C kernel, which shares no code with either verifier, proves the same property from the other side.

A second fixture pins the stage list that bundle.provenance_root addresses (§6), which is serialised by the same rules as the body. Every stage list in the corpus is ASCII, and on ASCII text an escaped and an unescaped serialisation agree, so no vector can tell them apart. The fixture's stages carry a two-byte and a four-byte character, with their members out of order, against literal bytes and their sha-256 id (sha256:c1caa0ce…f2638b).

A third fixture pins minor version 1's members (§3.1): a body whose energy.class and whose class's own members are out of order, against literal bytes and their sha-256 id (sha256:b473c94d…388b94); and the same input under "2.0", which the canonical form refuses.

5. Identity, chain and signature

• receipt_id = H(canonical body).
• chain.receipt_hash = H(chain.prev_hash ‖ canonical body), the previous hash as UTF-8 bytes. Every receipt after the first MUST carry a prev_hash equal to the previous receipt's receipt_hash, both strings — a hash that is not a string links nothing, so the receipt after it is a chain_break.
• chain.signature is Ed25519 (RFC 8032) over the UTF-8 bytes of chain.receipt_hash, verified against the key the vector file publishes under chain.signer. A published key is decoded strictly (RFC 8032 §5.1.3): it MUST be the canonical encoding of a point, and the point MUST NOT be of small order, which verifies a signature over any message. Every signature under a key that fails either is signature_invalid.

H is named by hash_alg: sha-256 writes sha256:<hex>, blake3 writes blake3:<hex>. A verifier that lacks the named algorithm MUST report missing_capability — never a mismatch, which would blame the producer for the verifier's gap. sig_alg MUST be ed25519.

6. Composition checks

Every check is evaluated in exact decimal arithmetic: no sum, product or comparison is rounded, so no verdict is decided by rounding noise and two conforming verifiers cannot disagree at a tolerance's edge. "Within t" means |a − b| ≤ t — a difference exactly at the tolerance passes, and a miss counts the same on either side — and every relative tolerance scales by the magnitude of the figure it names, so a negative figure is judged exactly as a positive one.

• Sum. The energy.breakdown terms MUST sum to joules_total within 1e-9 × max(1, |sum|).
• Floor. floor.floor_j MUST equal bits_committed · k_B · temperature_k · ln 2 within 1% of that product's magnitude — the Landauer floor for the bits the decision committed — with k_B = 1.380649e-23 J/K (exact by definition) and ln 2 taken as the decimal 0.6931471805599453, so the product itself is exact.
• Bundle. bundle.provenance_root = H of the stage list, each stage in bundle.stages[] member order, serialised by §4's rules exactly as the body is; the stages' joules MUST sum to joules_total within 1e-9 × max(1, |sum|); a bundle MUST carry efficiency.completed_units.
• Records. A receipt served from a record (settlement.served_from_record, with any record_id but unverified) cites settlement.record_hash, which MUST equal sha256("<key>|<answer>|<created>") over the record the vector publishes, with created written to one decimal place rounded half-to-even on its binary value. A record's key and answer are strings and its created a number (not a boolean); a record that is not, a record_id that is absent, empty or not a string, and a record store that is not an object cannot vouch for anything, so the receipt citing it is a record_mismatch. The check runs for a vector that publishes records; one that publishes none makes no claim about them and runs no record check.
• Ledger. The receipts' joules_total plus the ledger's unallocated_joules and carried_forward_joules (0 when absent) MUST equal its meter_joules within 1e-9 × max(1, |meter|). A ledger figure that is not a quantity (§4) makes the identity fail, and so does a receipt that states the unmetered marker (§3.1): a meter's reading cannot be accounted for by a receipt that states no figure.

7. Reasons

A verifier reports every reason a receipt fails, from this vocabulary, and nothing else, and a receipt too broken to check is a reason, never a verifier error. Some checks stop at the first failure and report it alone, discarding anything found before it; they run in this order, so a receipt with more than one names the same reason everywhere:

1. the receipt is not a JSON object — malformed;
2. oer is absent, not a string, or of another major — unknown_major (§3);
3. a member not listed for its path, chain included — canonical_failure;
4. the body carries a number §4 forbids — malformed;
5. hash_alg names an algorithm the verifier lacks — missing_capability;
6. any other member a check needs is absent or mistyped, hash_alg and bundle.stages (not a list) included — malformed.

Everything else accumulates. Some members are judged on their value, so a wrong one is a named reason rather than malformed:

• judged whether absent or mistyped — kind that is not a listed string is unknown_kind; energy.boundary that is not a non-empty string is boundary_missing; a bundle's efficiency that is not an object holding completed_units is efficiency_missing; sig_alg other than ed25519 is missing_capability, which, unlike an unsupported hash_alg, stops nothing;
• judged when present but mistyped, and malformed (step 6) when absent — a receipt_id that is not a string is receipt_id_mismatch; a chain.receipt_hash that is not a string is receipt_hash_mismatch and, since the signature is over it, signature_invalid; a chain.signer that is not a string, or names a key that is absent or not a string, is signer_unknown; a provenance.how that is not a string is grade_unknown.

reason	raised when
unknown_major	oer is absent, not a string, or of a major other than 2 (reported alone)
unknown_kind	kind is not one of §1's kinds
canonical_failure	a member not listed for its path (reported alone)
malformed	the receipt is not an object, a member a check needs is absent or mistyped (a quantity that is not a §4 decimal string or integer included), or the body carries a number §4 forbids (reported alone)
missing_capability	the verifier lacks hash_alg (reported alone), or sig_alg is not ed25519
receipt_id_mismatch	receipt_id ≠ H(body)
receipt_hash_mismatch	chain.receipt_hash ≠ H(prev_hash ‖ body)
chain_break	prev_hash ≠ the previous receipt's receipt_hash, or either is not a string
sum_mismatch	breakdown does not sum to joules_total
boundary_missing	energy.boundary is absent, empty or not a string
floor_mismatch	floor_j is not the Landauer floor within 1%
grade_unknown	provenance.how is not a §2 grade
abstention_settled	an abstain receipt carries an answer or a record (§3)
bundle_root_mismatch	provenance_root does not address the stages
bundle_sum_mismatch	stages do not sum to joules_total
efficiency_missing	a bundle without efficiency.completed_units
signer_unknown	chain.signer is not a string naming a published key that is a string
signature_invalid	the signature does not verify, or the published key fails §5's strict decoding
record_mismatch	a cited record does not rehash to record_hash, or cannot be rehashed (§6)
ledger_mismatch	the ledger identity does not hold
unmetered_invalid	a receipt of minor version 1 states the unmetered marker beside a breakdown term that is not null, a grade other than projected, a class, or as a bundle (§3.1)
class_invalid	a receipt of minor version 1 states an energy.class that is not §3.1's: an unknown or legacy label, or evidence missing, extra or of the wrong form
class_grade_mismatch	a valid energy.class does not support the receipt's grade, one of §2's (§3.1)

Beside its reasons, a verifier reports each receipt that states the unmetered marker as unmetered, by its receipt_id, whatever else it reports of it. A vector that declares unmetered, a list of receipt ids in the order of its receipts, passes only when the verifier reports exactly those receipts unmetered.

Reasons for receipts that share a receipt_id accumulate; a repeated id MUST NOT replace, and so hide, the reasons of an earlier receipt.

8. Conformance

reason-set-equivalence. For every vector in oer-conformance/, a conforming verifier reports exactly the declared set of reasons — the valid vectors none, each tampered vector exactly its own — and both fixtures (§4) hold.

file	vectors	produced by
vectors.json	9	the reference generator: a simulated corridor day, two valid vectors and seven tampered twins
firmware_vectors.json	1	the portable C kernel (settle/): 400 receipts, independent SHA-256 and Ed25519
edge_vectors.json	99	generate_edge_vectors.py: one case for each reason the upstream nine never exercise, each number shape and decimal-string defect §4 forbids and each limit from the accepting side, each bound and tolerance edge, each step of the order of the reasons reported alone, each member judged on its value, each claim an abstention cannot make, each key a signature cannot rest on, and the extremes a document may hold
job_vectors.json	38	generate_job_vectors.py: job receipts of minor version 1 (§3.1) under oer.job.media.encode: metered hops of each class with the grade it supports, the unmetered marker on its own, in a failover chain and on a failed hop, each rule of the marker and of the class broken once, each class held to a grade it does not support, a ledger over a chain that holds the marker, and the same members under minor version 0 and a minor version this text does not define; every vector declares the receipts it states unmetered, and every expectation is written by hand
unreadable/	11 documents	one for each way §4 refuses a document whole; every verifier must refuse all of them

The upstream vectors cover eight reason names; the edge vectors pin the rest, including malformed, canonical_failure and abstention_settled, the repeated-id rule, and every edge a verifier could draw in the wrong place: each integer bound from both sides; each decimal-string limit from both sides; each of the four tolerances — sum, floor, bundle, ledger — exactly at its edge and just past it, on both sides, for negative and small figures, and with the figure that sets its base; for each of the four, a verdict that flips if it is computed to 34 digits (and for the sum, to 28); each step of the order of the reasons reported alone; and keys that are small-order or non-canonical encodings, each under a signature that a lenient verifier accepts. Their expectations are written by hand from this document — none is copied from a verifier's output, which would only prove the code agrees with itself. The job vectors pin minor version 1's three reasons and its unmetered report the same way.

Two rules bind the producer and no reason in §7 can enforce them: the capability namespace, and receipting an unearned decision as an abstention (§3). A verifier cannot tell from a receipt's bytes whether a verdict was earned — only that an abstention claims none.

wai_oer_vectors verify oer-conformance              # wai-rs, --features oer: every file and unreadable/
python3 oer-conformance/oer2_verify.py <file>        # reference verifier, per file
python3 oer-conformance/oer2_verify.py --unreadable oer-conformance/unreadable
python3 oer-conformance/generate_job_vectors.py      # regenerates job_vectors.json byte for byte
python3 oer-conformance/fuzz_differential.py         # the two verifiers against each other
make -C oer-conformance/settle && oer-conformance/settle/settle_host out.json 400   # the C kernel

The vectors pin reason-set-equivalence one case at a time. Between them, fuzz_differential.py mutates corpus documents and requires the reference and wai-rs to report the same reasons, or the same refusal, for every one, and neither to crash.

CI runs wai_oer_vectors — every vector file and every document in unreadable/ — with the other cargo-class corpora, rebuilds the C kernel, and checks its output byte-for-byte against the pinned firmware_vectors.json and through wai_oer_vectors.

9. Departures from draft 0.1

This extension settles the points the draft left open. Each changes what a conforming producer writes or what a verifier accepts; none changes how a receipt is chained or signed.

• Capability namespace. The draft's vectors named decisions wai.settle.*, a namespace WAI reserves for payload formats. They are oer.decision.* here (§3), and the corpus is regenerated under the new names.
• One serialisation. The draft computed bundle.provenance_root with ASCII escaping and the body without it. Both use the body's serialisation here (§4, §6). Every stage list in the corpus is ASCII, where the two agree, so this rule alone moves no root — the corpus's roots differ from the draft's only because the rename changes every stage's receipt_hash. The stage-list fixture holds the rule.
• The number profile is normative. Both producers already wrote only integers and decimal strings; the draft did not require it. It is a MUST here (§4): integers within I-JSON's range, decimal strings in JSON's number grammar, anything else malformed, and a document outside §4's document profile refused whole. That removes disagreements between JSON parsers the draft's vectors never exercised.
• The checks are exact. The draft compared figures in whatever precision its reference happened to use; here every check is exact, with ln 2 pinned as a decimal (§6), so a verdict never depends on rounding.
• One tolerance rule. The draft's reference scaled the sum tolerance by the sum's magnitude but the floor, bundle and ledger tolerances by the signed figure, so a negative figure could fail a check it met. All four use the magnitude here (§6).
• Every shape has one reading. The draft's reference crashed, or reported something other than its reason, on members of the wrong type — a list where a string belongs, an object where a list does — and let a repeated member name hide a second value. §4 refuses repeated names, §7 names the reason for each wrong type, §5 says a link is a string, and §3's member lists hold inside chain too.
• Keys are decoded strictly (§5). The draft's reference accepted a small-order public key, and non-canonical encodings of one, under which a single signature verifies over every message.
• oer is a string (§3), so the major version never depends on a float parse.
• Abstention is its own outcome. The draft's escalate receipts carry the answer the escalation returned and store it as a record: they are verdicts, and §3 says so. A decision that was not earned is abstain, which claims no answer and stores no record, and abstention_settled holds it to that.