Adds ~110 more words across new domains: creatures (tiger→warm horizontal stripes, zebra→vertical, peacock/jellyfish→radial, dragon/phoenix, swan/raven/wolf/whale…), food & drink (wine/honey/coffee/cherry/mango/saffron/matcha/blueberry…), gems (opal/pearl/onyx/quartz/topaz/garnet/obsidian/moonstone…), architecture (city/cathedral/temple/tower/dome/labyrinth/maze/spire…), abstract concepts (love/passion/harmony/energy/freedom/infinity/eternity/zen/echo…), cosmic/sci-fi (plasma/quasar/pulsar/supernova/blackhole/matrix/circuit/hologram/wormhole…), botanical (lotus/orchid/daisy/sunflower/poppy/tulip/lily…), seasons (autumn/spring/summer/winter/harvest/solstice…) and synesthetic music (rhythm/melody/pulse/bass/jazz/blues/resonance…). Shape-bearing words carry the right primitive — supernova/pulsar/lotus→radial, cathedral/maze/matrix→mirror, blackhole/blues→gradient. Data-only: generate.rs + architecture unchanged (wasm unchanged), and the conformance prompt still matches only calm+horizon, so the pin is UNCHANGED (4bd80c0ef51bb843) — no test churn. Verified: tiger→horizontal stripes, supernova→radial rings, cathedral→symmetry, all byte-exact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
12 KiB
Mesh — Energy-Accounted Inference Serving & Routing
Version: 0.1.0-draft.1 · Status: Draft · Profile: mesh/1
Specification text: CC-BY-4.0 · Reference code (mesh-rs/): Apache-2.0
Mesh is the open standard for serving and routing inference as a metered transaction. A request declares a joule ceiling and a fidelity floor; the mesh routes it to the cheapest-sufficient model on the cheapest-sufficient backend, serves it under an energy meter, and seals a receipt whose headline figure is microjoules per accepted output token — measured at the meter, not estimated from a price list.
Mesh is one of the Transaction Science open standards. Transaction Science is the steward, not the proprietor: the wire format and the right to fork are public.
§1 Why Mesh exists
The serving shelf reports two numbers: dollars per token and tokens per second. Neither tells an operator, an auditor, or a regulator what an inference cost — in the one unit that is physical, comparable across hardware, and impossible to inflate: the joule. Mesh makes that number first-class. Every served inference produces a signed receipt carrying the route that was taken and why, the recipe that served it, the honest provenance of the energy figure, and the joules per accepted token.
Mesh does not replace the runtime that executes one inference, nor the substrate that supplies the compute. It is the front door in front of many models and many backends: the layer that decides where a request goes, meters what it spent, and proves it (§9).
§2 Roles and the serve lifecycle
A Mesh deployment has four roles:
- Caller — issues a
ServeRequestand, optionally, the JCP grant that authorises it. - Router — selects a backend (§4).
- Engine — a backend that serves the request (§5).
- Steward — the endpoint that meters the span (§5/§6) and seals the receipt
(§6). The steward identity is the COSE
kidand signs the receipt log.
One serve proceeds in four phases, in order:
- Authorise. If the request rides on a JCP
SignedGrant, the steward MUST verify the issuer signature, confirm the capability permits the actioninferon the request's content id, and confirm the grant's joule budget is ≥ the request's joule ceiling. A failure at any step aborts the serve before any work is done. - Route. The router selects the cheapest admissible backend (§4). If none is admissible, the serve fails with the router's recorded reason.
- Meter. The steward opens an energy window, calls the engine, and closes the window. Energy MUST be metered around the engine; an engine MUST NOT self-report energy.
- Seal. The steward builds the receipt (§6), stamps it into its hash-chained log, and seals it as a JCR-1 envelope.
§3 The request and the energy record
§3.1 ServeRequest
A request is content-addressed. Its identity request_id = ContentId.of(request)
is the resource a JCP capability authorises and the request_id on the receipt.
| Field | Type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
prompt_hash |
ContentId (BLAKE3) | content address of the prompt bytes — never the prompt text |
prompt_tokens |
u32 | declared input token count (for the estimate) |
max_tokens |
u32 | output token ceiling |
fidelity_floor |
Fidelity | minimum acceptable fidelity (§3.2) |
joule_ceiling_uj |
u64 | hard energy budget, microjoules |
A conforming request MUST carry both a fidelity_floor and a joule_ceiling_uj.
The pair is the contract: give me an answer at least this good, for at most this
much energy.
§3.2 Fidelity
Fidelity is an ordered scale F0 … F4 — F0 the coarsest sufficient answer
(cache / lawful / tiny model), F4 a frontier-grade response. Ordering is
normative: a backend is admissible only when its level ≥ the request's floor
(§4).
§3.3 Energy and provenance
Energy is a two-part integer-microjoule record with an honest provenance tag:
Energy { measured_uj: Option<u64>, estimated_uj: u64, provenance: Provenance }
Provenance ∈ { HwShunt, ModelBased, Estimator }
The coupling is normative and MUST be enforced before a receipt is sealed:
HwShunt⇒measured_ujis present (a hardware reading exists).Estimator⇒measured_ujis absent (no measurement is implied).ModelBased⇒measured_ujMAY be absent.
A receipt that violates the coupling MUST NOT be sealable. This is the rule that
keeps "measured" honest: a deployment with no hardware meter reports Estimator
and says so, rather than dressing an estimate up as a measurement.
§4 Routing — cheapest-sufficient
For each registered backend the router computes an estimate
est_total_uj = uj_per_token × (prompt_tokens + max_tokens) and marks it
admissible iff:
backend.fidelity ≥ request.fidelity_floor AND est_total_uj ≤ request.joule_ceiling_uj
The router MUST choose the admissible backend with the lowest est_total_uj.
Ties are broken deterministically (registration order). When no backend is
admissible the serve fails, and the decision records why.
The router MUST record, for every backend it weighed, a RouteCandidate with its
fidelity, estimate, admissibility, and — when inadmissible — a human-readable
reason (below floor / over ceiling). The chosen route MUST carry a one-line
justification. This is what makes a route auditable from the receipt alone:
the cheapest sufficient answer is preferred and a frontier model is the expensive
last resort, and the comparison is denominated in joules.
A model is addressed as a recipe — a base plus optional merges/adapters — not a fixed blob, so the receipt can record which composed model answered.
§5 The serving engine
A backend implements one interface: advertise a fidelity level and a modeled
per-token energy cost, and serve a request producing tokens and a ServeOutcome:
ServeOutcome {
tokens_in, tokens_out, tokens_accepted,
cache_hit_tokens, spec_proposed, spec_accepted
}
The input token payload travels with the serve call, alongside the request —
it is never part of the request's sealed identity and never enters the receipt,
which records only the content-addressed prompt_hash (§3.1). A receipt is
therefore safe to publish without disclosing the prompt.
tokens_accepted is the denominator of the wedge metric. For greedy decode it
equals tokens_out; under speculative decoding it is the number of proposed
tokens the target model accepted. cache_hit_tokens records output served from a
prefix/result cache (energy saved). An engine MUST do real work proportional to
the tokens it serves so the surrounding meter reads a real span; it MUST NOT
self-report energy.
The reference engine (mesh-engine::ReferenceEngine) is deterministic and
weights-free, for conformance. Production backends — a quantized device-resident
decoder, a high-throughput batching server — implement the same interface and
drop in unchanged; mesh-engine-gguf::GgufEngine (behind the gguf feature) is
one such backend over a pure-Rust GGUF/Metal decoder, so the mesh routes and
meters real model tokens.
§6 The receipt — mesh/1
A MeshReceipt is sealed with JCR-1: canonical det-CBOR (RFC 8949 §4.2.1)
inside a COSE_Sign1 envelope (RFC 9052, EdDSA/Ed25519, alg = -8), byte-compatible
with the rest of the family's receipts. The signed core forbids floats, booleans,
and nulls; booleans are encoded as 0|1 uints and absent options dropped.
§6.1 Wire fields (mesh/1)
| Key | Meaning |
|---|---|
mesh_receipt |
"mesh/1" |
request_id |
hex content id of the request |
grant_id |
hex JCP grant id this inference debited (omitted if ungranted) |
backend, recipe |
the backend and composed model that served it |
route |
the router's one-line justification |
tokens_in/out/accepted, cache_hit_tokens, spec_proposed/accepted |
the outcome counters |
fidelity_floor |
the floor the request demanded (uint) |
fidelity_met |
`0 |
estimated_uj |
always present |
measured_uj |
present iff provenance is HwShunt |
uj_per_accepted_token |
the wedge metric — energy.uj() / tokens_accepted |
energy_provenance |
`HwShunt |
sequence, prev |
hash-chain position and prior envelope's content id |
nonce, steward |
per-receipt nonce and the sealing identity (COSE kid) |
§6.2 The wedge metric
uj_per_accepted_token = energy.uj() / tokens_accepted, where energy.uj() is
the measured figure if present, else the estimate. It is null/absent when no
tokens were accepted. This is the number Mesh exists to make legible, and it is
sealed into every receipt.
§6.3 Hash chain
A steward keeps a receipt log. Appending a receipt stamps its sequence (from 0)
and prev (the content id of the previous sealed envelope; absent at genesis),
seals it, and advances the head. The log is tamper-evident end to end: altering
any envelope breaks verification of that receipt and the chain link from the next.
§7 Conformance
A conforming implementation MUST:
- Reject a serve whose grant fails verification, does not permit
inferon the request, or carries a budget below the request's joule ceiling (§2.1). - Choose the cheapest admissible backend and record every candidate weighed (§4).
- Meter energy around the engine and tag provenance honestly, enforcing the
Energycoupling before sealing (§3.3). - Seal the receipt as a JCR-1
mesh/1envelope and computeuj_per_accepted_token(§6). - Maintain a tamper-evident hash chain (§6.3).
The published vectors in ../conformance/v1/ pin a
deterministic reference serve. reference/signed_core.hex MUST canonical-CBOR
encode identically across implementations, and reference/envelope.hex MUST be
reproducible from it with the steward key in meta.json. Regenerate with:
cargo run -p mesh-conformance --bin gen-vectors -- ../conformance/v1
§8 Security considerations
Mesh composes proven primitives: Ed25519 signatures, BLAKE3 content addressing, RFC 9052 COSE_Sign1, and the JCP capability model. It introduces no new cryptography. Two properties are correctness, not style:
- Authorisation happens outside the model. The grant check (§2.1) is enforced by the steward before any inference runs; a prompt cannot grant itself budget or capability.
- Honesty is enforced at seal time. A receipt cannot claim a measurement it
does not have (§3.3). An operator without a hardware meter produces honest
Estimatorreceipts.
Energy figures are only as honest as the worst meter in the span. A receipt's
provenance tag states which meter produced its figure; consumers SHOULD treat
Estimator figures as bounds, not measurements.
§9 Relationship to the family
Mesh is the serving + routing fabric. It is expressed in primitives the family already publishes, and it composes with the neighbouring standards rather than duplicating them:
- It rides on JCP: a serve request is authorised by a JCP
Grant(capability ⊗ joule-budget), and the receipt seals in JCR-1 — the same envelope every family receipt uses. - It dispatches to runtimes such as JouleClaw: a backend that executes one inference cheaply is one engine behind the mesh.
- It routes across compute described by EOC and isolated by Sandbox: a backend may be a metered, attested execution target.
The boundary is deliberate: a runtime executes one inference; Mesh routes across many models and many backends and proves what each one cost.